Legal Opinion

In Re Allen Compound Bow Patent Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided March 3, 1978No. 324PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

This litigation consists of six actions pending in four districts: three actions in the District of Utah, and one each in the Central District of California, the Eastern District of Illinois, and the Western District of Wisconsin.

Allen Archery, Inc. (Allen Archery) is the owner by assignment from Holless W. Allen of a patent issued in 1969 on the “compound bow” — an archery bow with draw force multiplying attachments that allegedly employs principles totally different from the long bows and recurve bows used by archers for many centuries. All the actions in this litigation…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Foster Grant Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. In Re Commercial Lighting Products, Inc. Contract LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
  4. In Re Texas Instruments Inc. Employment Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Oklahoma Insurance Holding Co. Act LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
  2. In Re Magic Marker Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
  3. In Re Cable Tie Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API