Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boyd v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 16, 2013Published

1DissentSaxe, J.

Since the majority has unnecessarily thrust itself into the role of factfinder, I must respectfully dissent from the dismissal of the complaint. Our role as gatekeeper should not undermine the right of litigants to have their cases—even ones about which we are skeptical—heard by a jury. Even if our experience tells us that a litigant is likely to face an uphill battle, the courtroom is the proper venue for the determination of the controversy.

Flaintiff testified that he leaned back against what he thought was part of the sturdy, three-foot-high black iron fence surrounding a grassy area. Only…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mauriello v. Port AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Ortiz v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API