Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Martin
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Heher, J.
We concur in the view of the Supreme Court that the decree of the Prerogative Court should be affirmed, generally for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the late Vice-Ordinary Buchanan.
We deem it prudent to observe that the test of a gift m contemplation of death in the statutory sense is whether the determinative motive was “of the sort which leads to testamentary disposition.” It is requisite that the “thought of death” he the impelling cause of the transfer. If that be a controlling motive inducing the disposition of the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In Re Estate of LichtensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Estate of Berg v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1998
- First National Bank and Trust Company v. ZinkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- In Re Estate of ArmourNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.