Legal Opinion

Espenhain v. Meyer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The following statement of the case was prepared by Mr. Justice Tayloe as a part of the opinion: The respondents commenced an action against Franz Steinkirchner, as defendant, on May 15, 1889, to recover the sum of $2,200, alleged to be due from the defendant to the plaintiffs for goods sold and delivered.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The following statement of the case was prepared by Mr. Justice Tayloe as a part of the opinion: The respondents commenced an action against Franz Steinkirchner, as defendant, on May 15, 1889, to recover the sum of $2,200, alleged to be due from the defendant to the plaintiffs for goods sold and delivered. In that action the plaintiffs caused an attachment to be issued and the property of the defendant to be attached thereon. The in-terveners and appellants subsequently commenced actions against the defendant, and attached the same goods…

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

There was no question made upon the hearing of this appeal but that, upon a proper showing, the appellants had the right to intervene and have issues awarded, in order to try the question as to the priority of the liens of the appellants and respondents upon the money in the hands of the sheriff arising from the sale of the property attached by them in their respective actions. It was alleged by the parties that the court below refused to grant the issues as prayed for on the sole ground that the statements made in the petition and in the amended petition did not make out a case which made it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lytle v. LytleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. United States Express Co. v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Ayres v. HustedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  4. Hale v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Stage v. OldsOhio Supreme Court · 1843

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shakman v. SchwartzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API