Legal Opinion

Nealis v. Meyer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 15, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant from judgment of tbe First Judicial District Court. .' _

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

On December. 18, 189 5, the plaintiff was appointed, referee in,a Supreme Court action wherein the above-named defend-, a,nt,.was, plaintiff.and one Boylan defendant. .There were ,four, sittings before the referee, for which he became entitled to the. statutory .fee of $6 a day. Code, 1895, § 3296. He yus, algo; entitled to charge one sitting for preparing his report. Rothschild v. Werner, 4 Law Bulb 28; Von Prochazka v. Von Prochazka, 2 City Ct. Rep. 440. The justice awarded ,$30 for the five days sj>ent on the business of the reference, together with $6.75 paid by the referee for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Little v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Geib v. . ToppingNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Hinman v. HapgoodCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  4. O'Neill v. HoweNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tyrrel v. HammersteinNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Russell v. LythAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Batavia Times Publishing Co. v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Segal v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Thompson v. RichNew York Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API