Legal Opinion · Dissent

Youngren v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 30, 1979No. WCB No. 78-269, Claim No. 177-505, CA 13162Published

1DissentLee, J.

The result reached by the majority condones immature conduct. I would affirm the Workers’ Compensation Board’s denial of benefits because, as the Board found, claimant was not acting within his "course of employment” at the time that he struck the barrel.

Claimant was employed to patch defects in plywood panels. To ensure a free flow of glue from the applicator hose, it was the practice to periodically eject some of the adhesive into a bucket. The bucket of waste glue was from time to time emptied in a vat outside the plant. The most direct access to that vat was through a hole in the side of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hackney v. Tillamook Growers Co-Op.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Frosty v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API