Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Blount

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1935No. 1501PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LE BLANC, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment taken on confirmation of default. There was no note of testimony made and there is no statement of facts in the record. Defendant appellant relies principally on an exception of vagueness and on a motion for a new trial, both of which were overruled in the lower court, for a reversal of the judgment appealed from and a remand of the case to the lower court.

The original petition filed by the plaintiff was met with an exception of vagueness on the part of the defendant. This first exception was sustained by the lower court, and the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Francis v. BarbazonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Fletcher v. Ozone Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brazier v. Pride of Donaldsonville Tabernacle No. 40Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. General Tire Service v. NashLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Williamson v. Enterprise Brick Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Orleans Shoring Co. v. VerdunLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API