Legal Opinion

State v. Fowler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 4, 1978No. C77 12 17049, CA 10930Published

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant, convicted of armed robbery, appeals and makes two assignments of error.

His first assignment concerns the instruction given by the trial court relating to the claimed defense of duress. Defendant’s contention of coercion is based on testimony that he was ordered to enter the victim’s store by a third person who held a knife on defendant’s brother.

The instruction, based upon ORS 161.270, was given in relevant part as follows:

"[THE COURT:] The defense of duress has been raised. The statute says that a person is not criminally responsible for his alleged criminal conduct if he was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. Van DolahCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API