Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. Armac Industries, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 13, 1991No. 89 Civ. 4636 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The third-party defendant in the underlying action for personal injuries, General Thermoforming Corp. (“GTC”), a New York corporation, has moved to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment dismissing the claims against it pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons set forth below, the motion with respect to the contribution claim of defendant/third-party plaintiff Armac Industries (“Armac”), a Massachusetts Corporation is granted, and the motion with respect to its indemnification claim is denied at this time.
The Parties
The plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Rosado v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Quevedo v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Lambert Houses Redevelopment Co. v. HRH Equity Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marvin Gonzales v. Armac Industries, Ltd., Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, and General Thermoforming Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Gonzalez v. Armac Industries, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991