Claim of Goldflam v. Kazemier & Uhl, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Kazemier •& Uhl, Inc., and another, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the office of said Commission on the 1st day of November, 1917.
1Opinion of the Court
Cochrane, J.:
This appeal involves the question of the jurisdiction of the State Industrial Commission, under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, to make an award to an injured employee for medical services paid by him and rendered to him within sixty days after an injury sustained in the service of his employer. (Consol. Laws, chap. 67 [Laws of 1914, chap. 41], § 13.)
We think such jurisdiction exists. It was so held in Semmen v. Butterick Publishing Company (101 Misc. Rep. 285), the reasoning in which case we approve; A repetition of the reasons there stated would be superfluous. In addition to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shanahan v. . Monarch Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Semmen v. Butterick Publishing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- Louis Bossert & Sons, Inc. v. Piel Bros.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920
- Lebanon Hospital v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Staff v. Eagle Warehouse & Storage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924