Legal Opinion

Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC v. Adams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 16, 2018No. 1160877Published

1Opinion of the Court

SELLERS, Justice.

Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC, d/b/a GCR Tires & Service ("Bridgestone"), appeals from a judgment of the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court denying Bridgestone's motion to compel arbitration of an employment-related dispute. We reverse the trial court's judgment.

I

The record indicates that Ottis Adams began working as a sales representative for Bridgestone or a related entity in May 2006 and that he resigned or his employment was terminated in August 2016. It is not entirely clear what entity actually hired Adams in 2006. One affidavit Bridgestone submitted to the trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. TranSouth Financial Corp. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. BrunoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Companion Life Ins. Co. v. Whitesell Mfg., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Stamey v. EasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API