Legal Opinion

T.S.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 3, 1992No. 91-1287PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWART, Judge.

A home was burglarized and property stolen from it. The next day the defendant, a juvenile, and another person attempted to pawn some of the stolen property. The defendant was charged with burglary (§ 810.02, Fla.Stat.) and grand theft (§ 812.014, Fla.Stat.) and dealing in stolen property (§ 812.019, Fla.Stat.). The trial judge found the defendant not guilty of the burglary count but guilty of the grand theft and dealing in stolen property counts.

The defendant appeals basically arguing (1) that the circumstantial evidence was insufficient to support his convictions and (2) that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  2. State v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Ridley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Kelly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Francis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Haugabrook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API