Legal Opinion
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.
This is an action for an injunction to restrain the enforcement of Local Law No. 16 of 1939 (N. Y. City Administrative Code, § 487d-2.1) upon the ground of its unconstitutionality, and upon the further ground that the regulations and amended regulations adopted by the fire commissioner pursuant to said law are invalid and unenforcible. An injunction pendente lite heretofore has been granted. (Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. City of New York, N. Y. L. J., July 29, 1939, p. 238.)
The complaint contains two causes of action. Only the first one is pertinent here, since the motion now being considered is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Stubbe v. . AdamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- People v. President & Trustees of the OssiningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- People v. President & Trustees of OssiningNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- People v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boord v. WallanderNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- McLean Trucking Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc.New York Court of Special Session · 1953
- People v. WeinbergerNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1957
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports2001