Legal Opinion

Capitol Transportation Co. v. Cambria Steel Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 31, 1919No. 231PublishedCited by 52 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a petition to limit liability for the loss of cargo on The Benjamin Noble, brought by the present petitioner after libels in personam had been filed in different districts by the cargo owners, the Cambria Steel Company. The right was denied by the District Court on the ground that the vessel was unseaworthy with the privity and knowledge of the owner when sfie sailed and that the owner had made a personal contract by which it warranted seaworthiness. 232 Fed. Rep. 382. The findings, rulings and decree of the District Court were affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 244 Fed. Rep.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Butler v. Boston & Savannah Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Richardson v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. O'BRIEN v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Pendleton v. Benner LineSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Coryell v. PhippsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Earle & Stoddart, Inc. v. Ellerman's Wilson Line, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Cullen Fuel Co. v. W. E. Hedger, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby WearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Larsen v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API