Legal Opinion
Payne v. District of Columbia Government
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 6, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2008-0163Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AUDRICK PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 08-163 (CKK) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 6, 2011) Plaintiff Audrick Payne (“Payne”) filed this action against his former employer, the District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (“DCRA”), three of its former directors (Linda Argo, Lisa Morgan, and Patrick Canavan), and one of its supervisors (Nicholas Majett) (collectively, “Defendants”), contending that he was unlawfully terminated from his job because he spoke out…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.