Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Unimin Corp.1

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 26, 2016No. CV-16-375Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2016 Ark. 226

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-16-375 KATHY ROBERTS AND KAREN Opinion Delivered May 26, 2016 MCSHANE PLAINTIFFS REQUEST TO CERTIFY A QUESTION OF LAW FROM THE V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. UNIMIN CORPORATION DEFENDANT DISSENTING OPINION. HOWARD W. BRILL, Chief Justice Every first-semester first-year law student knows of the mystery and complexity of the Erie doctrine. See, e.g., Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins,

304 U.S. 64

(1938) (establishing the Erie doctrine by holding that, in diversity cases, federal courts were no longer “free to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Nolan v. Transocean Air LinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Bartley v. SweetserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Adams v. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Simpson v. Cavalry SPV I, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API