Legal Opinion

Nb v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 8, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2010-1511Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BR, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) v. Civil Case No. 10-1511 (RJL) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. {- MEMORANDUM OPINION (August S_, 2024) [Dkt. ##177, 178, 182, 184, 188] In this long-running dispute, plaintiffs, a putative class of Medicaid recipients who unsuccessfully sought coverage for prescription drugs, have sued the District of Columbia (“the District”), alleging that the District failed to provide them due process when their claims for those prescription benefits were denied. See generally Second Amended Compl. (“SAC”) [Dkt. # 98].…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. NB Ex Rel. Peacock v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  3. Rassoull v. Maximus, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  4. NB Ex Rel. Peacock v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  5. Jennings v. Family ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API