Legal Opinion

Reilly v. City of New York

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 23, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by Arthur T. Reilly against the City of New York. Defendant is entitled to. judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtSturges, J.

In the year 1911 plaintiff was employed as an auditor in the department of bridges of the city of New York at an annual salary of $2,700, or $225 a month. He received $157.50 for the month of April, $152.42 for the month of July, and $37.50 for the month of September. He claims $67.50 balance of salary for April, $72.58 balance for July, $15 balance for September, and $90 for salary in November. He resigned September 8th, was reinstated October 2d, and was removed from his position on November 13th. Subsequently, in March following, the action by which he was removed was re-' scinded, and,he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  2. People ex rel. Grimshaw v. PrendergastNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People ex rel. Grimshaw v. PrendergastAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Devlin v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1914
  2. Downey v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API