Legal Opinion

Pennington v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 13, 1995No. 2-93-534-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARDS, Justice.

Adlai Pennington appeals from his conviction for securing the execution of a document by deception. The jury assessed punishment of a two-year sentence probated for two years and a $10,000 fine. As a condition of probation, the trial court set restitution in the amount of $144,680.31, to be paid in monthly installments of $6,580 over the two-year probationary period.

Pennington’s only point of error on appeal asserts the trial court erred in setting the restitution amount by failing to consider Pennington’s ability to make the restitution payments. We conclude the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Rumph v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GonzalesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Mathis, John KentCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Ex Parte GonzalesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Jamaal Larome Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  5. John Click and Kristen Click v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API