Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Nephro-Tech, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Braintree Laboratories, Inc., the assignee of United States Patent No. 4,870,105, (hereafter ’105 patent) brought this patent infringement action against defendants Nephro-Tech, Inc. and G.P. Georges III, alleging that defendants’ mar keting and distribution of their calcium acetate product infringes the ’105 patent. A jury trial in this matter was held before this court between September 28, 1999 and October 7, 1999. On October 7, 1999, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, finding the ’105 patent valid and infringed, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- General Signal Corporation v. Donallco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- National Labor Relations Board v. Shurtenda Steaks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Karim (Andrew E.) v. Boyer (Nancy Ellen)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Woodson v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Cvent Inc v. RainFocusDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
- United States v. BorregoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2023
- Williams v. CommandantDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021