Legal Opinion

Sieland v. Hamel

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided January 21, 1953No. 1554PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HULEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed suit in the ¡State Court to cancel and revoke the will of George Sieland. Defendants removed on grounds of diversity, alleging amount involved exceeded $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs. Plaintiffs’ motion to remand raises the issue of jurisdiction (1) in a Federal Court to try a suit to revoke a will, and (2) that the administrator as a party destroys diversity.

I

Plaintiffs call our attention to cases decided by the Supreme Court holding that a court of equity is without jurisdiction to try a will contest if the suit is brought on the equity side,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sutton v. EnglishSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Ellis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Sawyer v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. Braeuel v. ReutherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  5. Love v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Colman v. ShimerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API