Legal Opinion

Kamar v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Orders (three papers), Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.), entered May 12, 1998, May 29, 1998, and September 23, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from and appealable, as limited by plaintiffs brief, denied plaintiffs motion to strike defendants’ answer pursuant to CPLR 3126 for discovery non-compliance, denied plaintiffs application to use an index number purchased for a special proceeding in the plenary action, and denied two motions for renewal, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although defendants waived reliance upon the jurisdictional defect caused by plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fry v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Poley Paving Corp. v. United Cerebral Palsy Association of Sullivan CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Lawrence v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Fortune Interior Dismantling Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Perry-Rogers v. FasanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Siegel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API