Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Hulin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1884PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Moutealm. (Y. H. Smith, J.) Appeal from allowance by probate commissioners. The claimant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

Edwin H. Stevens in 1866 owned, occupied and carried on a farm of two hundred acres in Bushnell, Montcalm county, and continued to do so until he died in 1879. After his death administration was had upon his estate by Moses H. Iiulin, who was duly appointed administrator. Commissioners to examine and adjust claims against the estate were duly appointed, and upon the last day for presenting claims against the estate, William H. Stevens presented a claim of something over $600 for the use of land and a load of hay. The commissioners allowed the claim at the sum of $611.25. Erom this decision…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bloomer v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Bennett v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stevens v. CastelMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McKeighan v. Citizens Commercial & Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Randall v. LingwallOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Pacific States Corporation v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Selik v. Goldman Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API