Legal Opinion

Chambers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 1989No. 55955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his motion to vacate, reduce or correct sentence and judgment pursuant to Rule 29.15. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Movant was convicted of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree and sentenced to twenty years imprisonment on each count to run concurrently. Movant’s conviction was affirmed on appeal in State v. Chambers, 744 S.W.2d 818 (Mo.App.1988).

Thereafter, movant filed a pro se motion to vacate judgment pursuant to Rule 29.15. Counsel was appointed and movant filed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Nunn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Fingers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. ChambersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LacyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State v. YoungMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Kulhanek v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Chambers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. AdkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API