Legal Opinion

Aetna Life Insurance v. Penn

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided July 1, 1907Published

Motion to remand for amendment, by adding parties.

1Opinion of the Court

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION.

The defendant in error, upon oral announcement of the court’s opinion heretofore rendered (see Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Penn, 16 Dec., 375), and before entry of judgment, moves the court, in accordance with the finding that the proper parties are not before it, to permit the beneficiaries to be made parties, and to remand the cause for this purpose. Counsel admits the correctness of the conclusions reached by the court as a matter of law, but claims that, as these go to the remedy only, the error of the plaintiff below in respect of the matters so found by this court are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Central Bank of Washington v. HumeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Abell v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Ripley v. SeligmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Leonard v. SweetzerOhio Supreme Court · 1847

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API