Legal Opinion
Kooman v. Boulder Bluff Condominiums, Units 73-123, 125-146, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided February 10, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00637Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BOBBIE JO KOOMAN, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT J. ROMIG, DECEASED, CASE No. 1:18-CV-637 and TERRY ROMIG, HON. ROBERT J. JONKER Plaintiffs, v. BOULDER BLUFF CONDOMINIUMS, UNITS 73-123, 125-146, INC., d/b/a BOULDER BLUFF ESTATES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER INTRODUCTION Robert Romig had trouble getting in and out of the Boulder Bluff Estates condominium unit he lived in with his ex-wife, Terry Romig. So, the Romigs’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Meyer v. HolleySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Growth Horizons, Inc. v. Delaware County, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Anderson Ex Rel. C.A. v. City of Blue AshCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- HDC, LLC v. City of Ann ArborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Lindsay v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.