Legal Opinion

Toledo, P. & W. R. R. v. Peoria & P. Union Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 2, 1934No. 5126PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

In a mortgage foreclosure suit brought against Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway Company, et al., the Peoria, and Pekin Union Railway Company intervened and sought to establish a claim for,moneys duo it under a contract which the parties had negotiated on the 1st day of March, 1898. In the foreclosure suit the mortgagor’s property was ultimately sold to the co-appellant, George P. McNear, Jr., and his liability was established, if it existed at all, by virtue of an order made at the time he purchased the property and because of a contract which he? at the time, executed.

*746The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Concord Apartment House Co. v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Heissler v. StoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hood v. Community High School District No. 304Appellate Court of Illinois · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Siano v. HelveringDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1936
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API