Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Hendricks
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 23, 2000No. Civil Action 97-5618(JEI)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, District Judge.
Robert O. Marshall (“petitioner”), a New Jersey prisoner currently under a sentence of death, brings a twenty-two count petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner also moves for discovery under Rule 6 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and for an evidentiary hearing. For the reasons set forth below, petitioner’s motion for discovery is denied, his motion for an evidentiary hearing is denied, and all counts of his petition are denied.
I. Procedural Background
On March 5, 1986, in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law…
2Cases cited117 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Marshall v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Marshall v. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Burns v. LaflerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Dunker v. BissonnetteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.