Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided January 31, 1995No. 06-94-00034-CVPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Elaine Hooper brought this suit against Gary Simpson, Robert Moretti, and Pitney Bowes, Inc. seeking damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress and slander. Hooper was a sales manager for Pitney Bowes, and Simpson and Moretti were two of her superiors. The jury found that only Simpson had inflicted emotional distress on Hooper. It also found that only Moretti had slandered Hooper, but it also found that Hooper consented to or otherwise produced the defamation. The jury awarded Hooper $50,-000.00 actual damages and $5,000.00 punitive damages…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wornick Co. v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ramos v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Gillum v. Republic Health Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  5. Houston Transit Co. v. FelderTexas Supreme Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. GTE Southwest, Inc. v. BruceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ross v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. Burden v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Minyard Food Stores, Inc. v. GoodmanTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API