Plummer v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of unlawful sale of liquor, from city court of Dublin —Judge Burch. January 14, 1907.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
The fact that this court will not undertake to review findings of fact by the lower court results not from a. mere unwillingness to do so, but because the constitution excludes from its jurisdiction the hearing and determining of any errors other than those “in law and equity.” That there is no evidence to support a verdict rendered is a question of law, and may, therefore, be reviewed; but where there is evidence of a defendant’s guilt, the sufficiency of this evidence to support the verdict is not rendered a question of law by reason of the fact that there was testimony which, if believed,…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Widener v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Rumsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- King v. City of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.