Legal Opinion

Hugo Brand Tannery, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided September 16, 1953No. Docket No. 27351Published

Petitioner having commenced business during the last base period year held entitled under section 722 (b) (4) to use a constructive average base period net income determined from the evidence.

1Opinion of the Court

Hugo Brand Tannery, Inc., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Hugo Brand Tannery, Inc. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 27351

United States Tax Court

20 T.C. 990; 1953 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 67;

September 16, 1953, Promulgated

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Petitioner having commenced business during the last base period year held entitled under section 722 (b) (4) to use a constructive average base period net income determined from the evidence.

O. L. Tucker, Esq., and Barry S. Cohen, Esq., for the petitioner.

John A. Clark, Esq., for the respondent.

Opper, Judge.

OPPER

In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Grinding Wheel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  2. Block One Thirty-Nine, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  3. Hugo Brand Tannery, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API