Legal Opinion

Van Arsdale v. Gorenflo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 2, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by A^ice-Chancellor Fielder, who filed the following opinion : “The bill is filed to foreclose a mortgage dated Majr 4th, 1914, given by Ida Gorenflo to complainant Alice M. Van Arsdale, covering several tracts of land situate in Newark and East Orange.

Read the full summary

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by A^ice-Chancellor Fielder, who filed the following opinion : “The bill is filed to foreclose a mortgage dated Majr 4th, 1914, given by Ida Gorenflo to complainant Alice M. Van Arsdale, covering several tracts of land situate in Newark and East Orange. The mortgage was given to secure the payment of a bond bearing even date with the mortgage made by Ida Gorenflo and another to said complainant, conditioned for the payment of the principal sum of $7,457.40, as follows: $250 on November 26th, 1914-, and the like sum of $250 every six…

1Per curiam

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

*491For affirmance — Tiie Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbact-i, Wi-iite, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yak Buskirii — 13. For reversal — None.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Malba Terrace Corp. v. Portaupeck PropertiesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Bruen v. SpannhakeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  3. Heilos v. State Land Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  4. Anthony v. AlmorthConnecticut Superior Court · 1935
  5. Simonson v. Z Cranbury AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API