State v. Gorman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Justice.
Defendant was found guilty of the crime of indecent assault. He had been tried before the court without a jury. The appeal is from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
It is the claim of the prosecution that defendant picked up a boy not quite four years old, gave him a ride in his car, and during the ride took indecent liberties with the boy. Defendant admits that he gave the boy a ride. He denies taking indecent liberties with him.
After the ride, the car stopped on a corner half a block from the boy’s home. His mother was standing in front of their home. When the door…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. FindlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Roach v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Lambrecht v. SchreyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Meyer v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Linderoth v. KiefferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Lancaster v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- State v. LanamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. BellottiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.