Legal Opinion

Onewest Bank, FSB v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ motion pursuant to CELR 5015, in effect, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court entered August 16, 2010, upon their default in appearing or answering the *970complaint, to set aside the foreclosure sale held pursuant thereto, and to vacate the referee’s deed in foreclosure. As to those branches of the appellants’ motion which were pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1), in effect, inter alia, to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale, the appellants failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default (see…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. SlavinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Dorrer v. BerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. HornesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Citimortgage, Inc. v. BustamanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Golden First Bank v. TalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. 150 Centreville, LLC v. Lin Associates Architects, PCNew York Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Citimortgage, Inc. v. BustamanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API