Legal Opinion

United States v. Yates

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided September 25, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-8-VAL (WDO)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

OWENS, Chief Judge.

All parties in this case have moved for judgment on the pleadings on the issue of whether defendant Edward M. Schuster, as guarantor, is liable for the deficiency on a promissory note despite the failure of plaintiff, the United States Small Business Administration, to obtain confirmation of a foreclosure sale of the property that secured the note. Because the court has heard no argument on any issues which may arise once this issue has been decided, the court’s order is limited to the issue of Defendant Schuster’s liability only. Any other decision would be premature…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wallace G. Frederick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Vaughn & Co. v. SaulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Kennedy v. Gwinnett Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. United States v. Thomas N. TerreyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. KunesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Provident Mutual Life Insurance v. City of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
  2. Peoples Bank v. HarpDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API