Legal Opinion

Rhoades v. City National Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1964No. 11178Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the action of the Trial Court granting the motion of defendant, appellee herein, for a summary judgment against plaintiff, appellant herein, that the contract sued on was illegal.

The appeal is predicated on two points assigned as error by the Trial Court in granting the summary judgment when the contract sued upon was legal and valid, and on the alleged ground that the law of ..the case had already determined that the contract was illegal.

Plaintiff alleged that the defendant’s deceased agreed to purchase or cause to be purchased from plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Potter County v. C. C. Slaughter Cattle Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. C. C. Slaughter Cattle Co. v. Potter CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Mercury Life & Health Company v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. McCormick v. RhoadesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API