Cantu v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
Appellant Raymond Cantu, Jr., appeals his conviction for voluntary manslaughter. He asserts three points of error on appeal. We affirm.
Appellant’s first point of error is that the trial court excluded testimony of the violent character of the deceased. Appellant relies on Dempsey v. State, 266 S.W.2d 876 (Tex.Crim.App.1964), which held that evidence of the violent character of the deceased is admissible to show that the accused acted in self-defense. Evidence of prior specific acts of violent misconduct by the deceased are admissible where there is evidence that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dempsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Wisdom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Duncantell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Quevedo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.