Lawrence v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtD. F. Walsh, P.J.
Defendant Department of Corrections appeals by leave granted from the order of the Ingham County Circuit Court denying the defense motion for accelerated judgment. The court ruled, inter alia, that a prison misconduct hearing is a "contested cáse” within 'the meaning of Michigan’s Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et seq.; MSA 3.560(101) et seq. Defendant’s appeal is limited to the issue presented in this portion of the trial judge’s ruling. We affirm.
Plaintiff James Lawrence was an inmate at the State Prison of Southern Michigan at Jackson. On August 3, 1976, a misconduct report was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Husted v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Wayne County Civil Service Commission v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Walen v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Dickerson v. WardenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Fichtner v. Iowa State PenitentiarySupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Martin v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Land v. George Schmidt Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.