Legal Opinion
Barnett v. Bachrach
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 4, 1943No. 117PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Associate Judge.
Defendant engaged Dr. Joseph Harris to treat his wife during her period of pregnancy. There was evidence that in the course of such treatment she complained of certain pains in her lower right abdomen, and of nausea. Dr. Harris made a diagnosis of tubal pregnancy. He called in the plaintiff, a surgeon, for consultation. Plaintiff took the history and made a pelvic examination, in the presence of Dr. Harris. He found a mass the size of a small orange in the right ovarian region; from that. and other symptoms he made a diagnosis of a tubal or extra-uterine pregnancy,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Child Labor Tax CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Pratt v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gray v. GrunnagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Funeral Services by Gregory, Inc. v. Bluefield Community HospitalWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- Stephen Kozup v. Georgetown University, D/B/A Georgetown University Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- John N. Dunham, Administrator of the Estate of Dorothy Louise Sipling, Deceased v. Frederick W. Wright and Frederick M. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Curtis v. JaskeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.