Legal Opinion

Patino v. One 2007 Chevrolet, Vin 1GNFC16017J255427, Texas License Plate 578VYH

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 31, 2011No. A11-309PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellant Laura Patino challenges the district court’s order directing forfeiture of her automobile under Minn.Stat. § 169A.63 (2010). Appellant argues that the district court erred when it failed to return the automobile to her following her request for a judicial determination of the forfeiture.

Because the forfeiture was based on the commission of an underlying designated offense enumerated in the statute, and the offending party appeared as required and was not convicted of the designated offense, the district court erred by refusing to return the automobile to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mastakoski v. 2003 Dodge Durango, VIN 1D8HS78Z13F530764Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Mycka v. 2003 GMC Envoy, MN Plate RPG535, VIN 1GKDT13S432414651Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patino v. One 2007 Chevrolet, VIN 1GNFC16017J255427, Texas License Plate 578VYHSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Woodruff v. 2008 MercedesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Equine Luxury Properties, LLC v. Commercial Capital Bidco, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API