Legal Opinion

Peate v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1990No. 71S00-8811-CR-935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

The defendant, Joey Peate, was convict ed of robbery, Class A felony. On appeal he raises the following issues: 1) admission of co-defendant's statement; 2) admission of defendant's statement; and 3) sufficiency of the evidence.

1. Admission of Co-Defendant's Statement

The defendant argues that the trial court erred in admitting State's Exhibit 9, the statement of co-defendant Michael Taylor, which was given to police a few hours after the robbery. He contends the statement should not have been admitted because there was no showing that it was consistent with Taylor's in-court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Dudley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hughes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Larry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Berry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Sipress v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Wagner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Burton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API