Peate v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
The defendant, Joey Peate, was convict ed of robbery, Class A felony. On appeal he raises the following issues: 1) admission of co-defendant's statement; 2) admission of defendant's statement; and 3) sufficiency of the evidence.
1. Admission of Co-Defendant's Statement
The defendant argues that the trial court erred in admitting State's Exhibit 9, the statement of co-defendant Michael Taylor, which was given to police a few hours after the robbery. He contends the statement should not have been admitted because there was no showing that it was consistent with Taylor's in-court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Dudley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Hughes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Larry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Sipress v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Wagner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Burton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.