Legal Opinion

Daly v. Paul Revere Variable Annuity Ins. Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 10, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

206 N.J. Super. 185 (1985)

502 A.2d 48

ROSEMARY DALY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

THE PAUL REVERE VARIABLE ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 18, 1985.

Decided December 10, 1985.

Before Judges FURMAN and ASHBEY.

Thomas E. Durkin, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Dennis A. Durkin and Stephen D. Landfield, on the brief).

James M. Shaughnessy argued the cause for respondent (Haythe & Curley, attorneys; Mr. Shaughnessy and James J. Markowski, of counsel and on the brief).

2Per curiam

We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CatlowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Daly v. Paul Revere Variable Annuity Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CatlowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Webb v. WittNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. ManzoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  4. Jones v. United States Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API