Legal Opinion

Roberge v. Monheimer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 15, 1897Published

AppEAi/from judgment rendered by the justice of the Eleventh Judicial District Court in favor of the plaintiff;

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The plaintiff has- recovered a- judgment, against .the defendant for services performed by him, as-a blacksmith, in shoeing two horses, at several times, during a period extending from April 4, 1892, to September 21, 1895, but upon examination of the return it appears clearly that the evidence was insufficient-to -supiport" a recovery based upon any agreement' by the defendant,- express or implied, to pay for the work.

>■ -Prior to April 4," 1892, the plaintiff-had shod these horses at the request of one Beamer, whose property they, were, but on or about, that date Beamer told him that he no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sier v. BacheNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API