Legal Opinion

Moore's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1910No. 1; Appeal, No. 20PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal, No. 20, Jan. T., 1910, by Fidelity Trust Company and Walton Pennewill, surviving executors, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., July T., 1898, No. 56, dismissing exceptions to adjudication of fifth account in Estate of Andrew M. Moore, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication of Lamorelle, J. The facts appear in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was in dismissing exceptions to adjudication.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

Andrew M. Moore and Joseph F. Sinnott were partners under the firm name of Moore & Sinnott. ' The interest of Moore in the firm was seven-sixteenths, and that of Sinnott was nine-sixteenths. The partnership articles provided that in the event of the death of one *518partner, the survivor should have the right to continue the business for his own individual benefit and profit, and that he should pay for the share of the deceased partner in five annual installments. They were engaged in the business of distilling and selling whisky, and as a firm they also made large…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Appeal of HarbsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Crawford's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Wood's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. In Re Estate of BrockermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. In Re Reed EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Bickel AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API