Russell v. Hayden

ANDERSON, O. J.

Upon former appeal (201 Ala. 517, 78 South. 871) this court held that the bill of complaint was defective, in that it failed to sufficiently set out the facts or particulars of the contract, express or implied, of the claimed copartnership Sinde the reversal several amendments have been made to the bill, and we are of the opinion that the bill as last amended was not subject to the grounds of demurrer as are insisted upon in the argument of counsel upon this appeal. As we gather from the averments of said amended bill, Ralph M. Russell was conducting a business in Birmingham;…