Legal Opinion
Pope v. Bolin
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
Drue Bolin, on inquisition proceedings instituted by her brother, AV. D. Pope, under article 2, chapter 299, of the Code (section S103 et seq.), was duly adjudged of unsound mind, and AV. B. Ford was thereupon appointed guardian of her estate.
Thirty-eight days after such adjudication Drue Bolin filed' her application under Code, § 8110, for a revocation of the proceedings against her and of the letters of guardianship.
AV. D. Pope, cited under Code, § Sill, appeared and denied the averments of the petition, and a trial was had pursuant to Code, § 8112, resulting in a verdict finding the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Simon v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Craft v. SimonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Lucas v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
- Chase v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sullivan v. QuinlivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Nigg v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Bradford v. RagsdaleTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
- Cadden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.