Legal Opinion

Spiecker v. First National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1925No. 18945. Department TwoPublished

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is a replevin action brought against appellants for levying an execution upon and seizing a crop of wheat raised upon the land of respondents in 1923. The case was tried to a jury on the complaint, amended answer and reply.

The return of 2,860 sacks of wheat, or the alleged value thereof in the sum of $6,000, and damages for the detention of the same in the sum of $600, was demanded by respondents in their complaint. The amended answer of appellants set up certain denials, and by way of affirmative defense, among other things, alleged that Herbert Spiecker, the son of respondents, was the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woody v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Plough Hardware Co. v. BruceWashington Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API