Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Nissenbaum

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 12, 1989Published

1DissentLiacos, J.

Many years ago, Chief Justice Lemuel Shaw, writing for the court in a case involving art. 2 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, stated: “This cause was argued some time since, and partly on account of the intrinsic difficulty attending some of the questions raised in the case, and a difference of opinion among the judges on some of these questions, it has stood over for consideration *588and advisement, to the present time.” Commonwealth v. Kneeland, 20 Pick. 206, 211 (1838).

One hundred and fifty years later we have experienced similar difficulty. The difficulty is caused partly by the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Commonwealth v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. VanderpoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Alegata v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Commonwealth v. OrlandoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API