Legal Opinion

State v. Dale

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 16, 2020No. 117162PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,162 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER M. DALE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Neither the Double Jeopardy Clause in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution nor K.S.A. 21-3107(2)(a) absolutely prevent the continued prosecution of some counts in a prosecution after a criminal defendant has been convicted on other counts. If the continued prosecution follows a defendant's post-conviction appeal that sought a new trial and, on remand, a defendant is found guilty of a greater offense after a lesser included offense has…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. PlummerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. Ngan PhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MendezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. State v. CobleSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API