Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Spikes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1923No. 2099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBotch, J.

At the general election of 1920 S. C. Spikes was elected tax collector of Lubbock county and C. A. Holcomb was elected sheriff. There was a controversy as to whether, under the provisions of article 8, § 16, of the state Constitution, the office of tax collector of said county was, at the time of such election, separate from that of sheriff. Holcomb claimed that, by virtue of his election as sheriff of Lubbock county, he was ex officio collector of taxes therefor. The commissioners’ court of the county sustained Holcomb in this contention, and approved his bonds as sheriff and tax collector,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nichols v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Kreitz v. BehrensmeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Holcomb v. SpikesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Jones v. DusmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Pease v. State Ex Rel. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cooper v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API